![]() 10/10/2014 at 15:57 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
A stanced Mercedes. Thoughts?
![]() 10/10/2014 at 15:58 |
|
The wheels dont suit the car at all. Also the tyres need more meat on them.
![]() 10/10/2014 at 15:58 |
|
I like those wheels, not on that car though. They look oddly small.
![]() 10/10/2014 at 15:58 |
|
Very much no. Wait a minute, are there even any tires!?!? And that roof rack....
![]() 10/10/2014 at 15:59 |
|
Not a fan of the roof rack, other than that, I LOVE IT.
![]() 10/10/2014 at 15:59 |
|
Why do most stanced cars have a roof rack?
![]() 10/10/2014 at 16:00 |
|
The horror. The horror.
![]() 10/10/2014 at 16:00 |
|
Kill it. With fire.
10/10/2014 at 16:01 |
|
Those are actually 3DSM's.
![]() 10/10/2014 at 16:01 |
|
I really like the Style 0.05 wheels, but not a fan of the lack of rubber.
![]() 10/10/2014 at 16:01 |
|
I agree. The tires did look quite small.
![]() 10/10/2014 at 16:02 |
|
I saw your Stanced Mercedes and give you my Stanced Citroen!
Oh wait..
![]() 10/10/2014 at 16:02 |
|
I wouldn't know. I didn't even know what "stanced" was until a few months ago.
![]() 10/10/2014 at 16:02 |
|
Indeed.
![]() 10/10/2014 at 16:03 |
|
the roof rack also doesn't really fit the car that well. Would look much better on an Audi.
![]() 10/10/2014 at 16:04 |
|
That's impressive.
![]() 10/10/2014 at 16:04 |
|
Awwh.. why you guys no like my favourite cars.. *sniff sniff* *crying like a little girl* :)
![]() 10/10/2014 at 16:04 |
|
True.
![]() 10/10/2014 at 16:04 |
|
I have brought great shame to my family.
![]() 10/10/2014 at 16:05 |
|
Because most stanced cars have a roof rack.
Seriously, I think it's just a self-perpetuating style choice.
![]() 10/10/2014 at 16:07 |
|
I can hear that front spoiler scraping and the wheels thudding against the wheel wells.
![]() 10/10/2014 at 16:12 |
|
Well, it's stock.
All Citroens comes with that fancy Hydraulic suspension that shuts off when the engine is off, so the car always looks low down when it's parked.
My Favourite is of course the SM Opera
![]() 10/10/2014 at 16:12 |
|
Oh, no doubt about that.. my third car looked something like this
But it had the small bumpers, was a tad lower and was purple (and had a 200ish HP engine), and I LOVED it. Was it stupid? Sure, was it way to low? DAMN RIGHT IT WAS, Did I love it? Heck yeah,
![]() 10/10/2014 at 16:17 |
|
Wow. I'd forgotten how long those were.
How have you liked your vehicle?
![]() 10/10/2014 at 16:21 |
|
Hate everything about it, kill it with fire.
![]() 10/10/2014 at 16:22 |
|
Well, everytime i steps in i feels like living my screen name. It's awfully slow, yet quite fast in the same time.
I mean, the GS only has 60hp, yet it can do 100mph.
![]() 10/10/2014 at 16:24 |
|
Very cool.
![]() 10/10/2014 at 16:24 |
|
Because the trunks are full of the air tanks and compressor. No trunk space. Usually the back seat has a ton of speakers too, so the only way to get utility out of them is by stacking shit on top.
/mybestguess
![]() 10/10/2014 at 16:25 |
|
Possible. I know I'd put a roof rack on mine because I actually like them.
![]() 10/10/2014 at 16:28 |
|
My wagon has a roof rack, but I really wanted one because I haul a lot of stuff, and the bike doesn't always fit inside the car if I have a lot of other stuff with me.
![]() 10/10/2014 at 16:43 |
|
looks like the tires are missing completely.
![]() 10/10/2014 at 17:07 |
|
It really does.
![]() 10/10/2014 at 17:27 |
|
Love it, those wheels are awesome. I know I'm the only one who thinks this so I'll see myself out. But that's perfect.
![]() 10/10/2014 at 17:29 |
|
No, don't. Everyone is untitled to their own opinion.